Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:02
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Scientists visualize key protein structures linked to immune response and inflammation - Phys.org
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
If there exists a “New York of Australia”, is it Sydney or Melbourne?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Inflation Expectations Decline; Labor Market Expectations Improve - Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why do some men like older women?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
What can I do to deal with disrespectful children?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?